|
On this day in 1965... |
Log In to post a reply
|
| View: flat \ threaded |
|
|
||
|
revox 667 posts |
...Malcolm X was assassinated. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. George Santayana. ~8^|> ............................................... Re: On this day in 1965... (mirtchevman) Re: On this day in 1965... (rufus) Re: On this day in 1965... (modularman) Re: On this day in 1965... (deadniggerstorage) |
Feb 21, 2010, 23:28
|
|
________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________ |
||
|
mirtchevman 1469 posts |
revox wrote: ...Malcolm X was assassinated. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. George Santayana. ~8^|> 'true dat, i thought you knew dat.' - AZ |
Feb 24, 2010, 18:54
|
|
________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________ |
||
|
jauntymonty 1504 posts |
I won't post that song "History Repeating" by the Propellerheads...gah..uggg.
...............................................
In reply to: Re: On this day in 1965... (mirtchevman) |
Feb 24, 2010, 19:04
|
|
________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________ |
||
|
rufus 82 posts |
I wonder if they would shoot him these days. The media seems so compliant that they would just silence X if the govt asked them too |
Feb 25, 2010, 09:27
|
|
________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________ |
||
|
revox 667 posts |
rufus wrote: I wonder if they would shoot him these days. The media seems so compliant that they would just silence X if the govt asked them too "They"? Is that the Jody Foster fanatics "they", or are you suggesting that a non-compliant media meant that the US Government had to take up close 'n' personal action regarding Mr X's demise? ~8^|> |
Feb 25, 2010, 19:49
|
|
________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________ |
||
|
modularman 14 posts |
|
Feb 26, 2010, 14:16
|
|
________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________ |
||
|
deadniggerstorage 1 posts |
![]() |
Feb 26, 2010, 14:26
|
|
________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________ |
||
|
rufus 82 posts |
revox wrote: rufus wrote: I wonder if they would shoot him these days. The media seems so compliant that they would just silence X if the govt asked them too "They"? Is that the Jody Foster fanatics "they", or are you suggesting that a non-compliant media meant that the US Government had to take up close 'n' personal action regarding Mr X's demise? ~8^|> Sorry, I will have to resubmit my PHD thesis after your criticisms ;) I was being a bit too offhand in my tweet with "they" being anyone powerful who might wanna shoot some "troublemaker". I respectfully withdraw "govt", Mr Acting Deputy Speaker. |
Feb 26, 2010, 20:26
|
|
________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________ |
||
|
rufus 82 posts |
deadniggerstorage wrote: ![]() Does "report this post" work because this seems kinda off? And if this is their only contribution...
...............................................
In reply to: Re: On this day in 1965... (deadniggerstorage) ............................................... Re: On this day in 1965... (revox) Re: On this day in 1965... (cyberpainter) |
Feb 26, 2010, 20:30
|
|
________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________ |
||
|
revox 667 posts |
rufus wrote: Does "report this post" work because this seems kinda off? And if this is their only contribution... I think that the general opinion (of most of the intelligent people here) is to see it for what it is. There is a tendency neither to feel sorry nor outraged by such nonentities, and certainly not permit them to achieve their aim, which seems to be the damage of freedom of expression, thought and discourse (with the odd reference to Stereolab thrown in for good measure). ~8^)> |
Feb 26, 2010, 23:30
|
|
Pages: 2 – [ 1 2 | Next ] |
add a reply to this topic |
|
________________________________________________________________\______________________________________ |
|
| stereolab table Index | |