________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________
|
jauntymonty
|
Re: Supreme Court to rul on freedom of speech case...
Labhead wrote:
I remember during Bush's years, they would have "free speech zones", a mile down the road, around the corner, well out of site of the event. I could be exaggerating just a little, but it was bad almost like they weren't even there.
The First Admendment also has restrictions on free speech which can be interpreted in favor of the law enforcing entity such as claiming they are providing "protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons."
|
Mar 09, 2010, 18:51
|
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Topic Outline:
- Supreme Court to rul on freedom of speech case... – Mu Mu, Mar 08, 2010, 19:51
- >Re: Supreme Court to rul on freedom of speech case... – Mars Rover, Mar 08, 2010, 20:42
- >Re: Supreme Court to rul on freedom of speech case... – jauntymonty, Mar 08, 2010, 20:51
- >Re: Supreme Court to rul on freedom of speech case... – Eddie Chargeman, Mar 09, 2010, 01:36
- >Re: Supreme Court to rul on freedom of speech case... – cyberpainter, Mar 09, 2010, 05:30
