+Start a topic
?Search __________________________________

-Log In
Shame on the Swiss
Log In to post a reply
118 messages
View: flat \ threaded

642 posts

Re: General question for those supporting Polanski...

velvetwater wrote:
JS wrote:
Squirrel M. Nutter wrote:
Here is a great take on the situation: (snip)

You say in the title "General question for those supporting Polanski..."

This is dishonest, and a flaw of logic. You stupidly assume that because some of us are not madly outraged that Polanski escaped justice, that we support him and therefore support rapists.

I think nobody here are "supporting" Polanski, rather, we just think that little good will come out from sending a harmless old man to jail. Yes, Polansky should have been to jail, but now, it's too late. An unlikely chain of circumstances made him escape justice for decades. Too bad.

JS, you explained your position very clearly here. It is exactly the same concept I had tried to put forward.
And yet some are trying to twist your words and use them against you. Don't succomb to this type of provocation and do as I did: quit this post.
Those people have zero tolerance for whoever has a different opinion and, even more sadly, are not capable of discussing a subject of this sort without resorting to dishonest dialectic manipulation. More generally they are simply not able to exchange views on sensitive issues and are blind/deaf to what is actually said by whoever disagrees with them.
They are like totally obsessed by some kind of very inflexible morality (and yet some have said that they would flee justice in order to rebel against authority!).
I have tried several times in my life and I came to the conclusion that certain topics are impossible to discuss about or are even completely off limits: for example paedophilia, holocaust, religion, to an extent even political orientation. Just keep your opinions to yourself. It is not worth it, at least in a forum of this sort.

For a person who stopped posting to this thread, you sure post a lot here! But thats good, keep the dialect going.

And talk about "dishonest dialectic dishonesty," JS entered this thread for no reason other than to be a troll and attack me. His first post did not address the topic at all. He only talked about the subject matter after I called him out for being a troll.

And even then, he ignored the facts and twisted things around to make it look like I attacked him (as I predicted he would).

Look at his post that you quoted, he says, "You say in the title 'General question for those supporting Polanski...This is dishonest, and a flaw of logic. You stupidly assume..." Except, that was Vivakomeda's subject heading, I just responded to it. JS is not interested in discussing this topic, that's why he has not made any reasonable arguments in this thread at all. He is so bizarrely obsessed with me and attacking me, that he doesn't even pay attention to who is posting what.

Side with JS all you want, but its obvious to everyone that he is nothing but a troll.

As for Polanski, he is a convicted felon who fled justice. No one has presented a legal argument for why he should not face justice.

Jul 17, 2010, 20:27


Topic Outline: