Re: Would the introduction of a moderator be good for the forum?
velvetwater wrote:
cyberpainter wrote:
You consider Dev's post an attack, and in the next sentence say some should be banned because they're simply annoying and like insects?
Do you know the difference between a personal opinion and a dictatorial enforcement of it?
I did not say that Dev's post was either rude or annoying, but it was a criticism of me when I was actually generating an open debate about a concept and not about individual people.
He brought the subject up and again I offered my opinion.
Yes, I do think that those 1 or 2 (without counting the double identities) users are irritating and the reference to insects means "annoying and difficult to ignore (as he was suggesting I should do)".
I can understand the difference. If you want to get into a debate with me, believe me, I will be very up to the challange.
Considering your other thread, this follows a similar path, and of course can't be completely considered merely an abstract idea. You have a bone to pick with another member, and don't seem to want to stop unless the conclusion is that you win in some way.
