________________\________________________________________________\______________________________________
|
Stereo Mouse
|
People get music for free - detrimental to artists?
Laetitia has recently expressed concern that because people now get to d/l music pretty much for nothing, this means that records won't be sold as much and it may turn out that musicians may not be able to make a living with music in the future. What would you speculate? Is this indeed the shape of things to come or is it just a tough transitional time and artists might earn from music in some other ways? Just how important is it to sell records in order to earn from music? What do you think?
|
Oct 08, 2008, 07:14
|
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Topic Outline:
- People get music for free - detrimental to artists? – Stereo Mouse, Oct 08, 2008, 07:14
- >Re: People get music for free - detrimental to artists? – JS, Oct 08, 2008, 11:22
- >Re: People get music for free - detrimental to artists? – DevastatorJr., Oct 08, 2008, 13:29
- >Re: People get music for free - detrimental to artists? – cybele, Oct 08, 2008, 15:02
- >Re: People get music for free - detrimental to artists? – Thessaly, Oct 08, 2008, 19:58
- >Re: People get music for free - detrimental to artists? – GaryB, Oct 08, 2008, 19:58
- >Re: People get music for free - detrimental to artists? – murilix, Oct 09, 2008, 04:41
- >Re: People get music for free - detrimental to artists? – Bytor Peltor, Oct 09, 2008, 14:30
- >Best Of Albums - Shit You Already Have – cybele, Oct 09, 2008, 15:04
- >Re: People get music for free - detrimental to artists? – easychord, Oct 09, 2008, 15:26
- >Thats a silly question – Cheeso, Oct 10, 2008, 03:43
- >Re: Thats a silly question – cyberpainter, Oct 10, 2008, 04:52
- >Re: Thats a silly question – Stereo Mouse, Oct 10, 2008, 07:08
- >Re: Thats a silly question – JS, Oct 10, 2008, 20:30
- >Re: Thats a silly question – Kazak, Oct 10, 2008, 21:36